SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TARADO96 who wrote (81244)10/19/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
athm $125? Hmmm I don't know about that.

Looks like the street expects vignette to blow away earnings, did you see them at your SF conference William? I like Vignette.



To: TARADO96 who wrote (81244)10/19/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: Danny  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
I dont believe ATHM will reach 125 in 3 months unless somebody (say AOL) buy them out. But my money is in both
companies because 125 can be easily achieved
in 3 years.

Which is all I hope for.



To: TARADO96 who wrote (81244)10/19/1999 8:26:00 PM
From: re3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
<<<<<<<Internet analyst at Prudential sees AOL at $212 and ATHM at $125. Says he that within 2-3 months, elements will be introduced by AOL which will make the company even more appealing to investors. Here is the full article:

this is downright silly if you ask me...aol will not ever see 212

ike



To: TARADO96 who wrote (81244)10/20/1999 2:08:00 AM
From: Eric Wells  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Merenbloom: In fact, free access actually helps AOL.

cbs.marketwatch.com

It takes one heck of a lot of chutzpah for an analyst to say that free access will help AOL - considering that AOL gets some 65% of it's revenue and earnings from charging people for access.

It's sort of Orwellian double-speak: losses are profitable, negative is positive, red is black. I guess it's not really "double-speak" - it's more like "bubble-speak".

-Eric