SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stan s. who wrote (45518)10/19/1999 11:05:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122089
 
I don't go long much nowadays. I think the bottom is about to fall out of the market, and that well chosen shorts is the place to be. Even if the bottom doesn't fall out, I can consistently outperform the market with my shorts, so I play from my perception. If the bottom does fall out, I'll make a killing.

Regards,

Barb



To: stan s. who wrote (45518)10/19/1999 11:19:00 PM
From: SLSUSMA  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122089
 
Ouch! Good one. She does like to belabour the points without reading the posts completely.

Couple of points:

1) I'm out of NAVR (have been since that semi-run up), so there goes the agonizing, angry long theory.

2) Conversation started when someone called A@P the greatest trader of all time. Well, if you follow him, you may think so. If you don't, then it ain't.

Message 11638925

3) Then we talked about SKYM. His claims versus the actual posts.

Message 11642592

Gentlemenly disagreement, until a certain busybody, who always intervenes in other people's business, stepped in.

Now I'm labeled a NAVR long who is angry and stifling market conversation. Go figure.

Message 11644217

Message 11644261

Had our lovely lady been keeping track of NAVR thread as she claimed, she would have realized that I've always been a skeptical NAVR long who was looking to cash out and short at any run up.

Nonetheless, good one.

Regards,

USMA95



To: stan s. who wrote (45518)10/20/1999 12:36:00 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Respond to of 122089
 
LOL!!! Substance you want substance ?? I have posted 10,000 posts 80% are filled to the rim with substance..You canmnot handle substance ,, so why bother < i know the stocks suck and they will collapse ,,that senough for me, see it isnt important if I convince you or anyone of that fact..it is true and so My win is known in advnce, so why bother explaining it..It simpler to just say It sucks ..period..I could care less if you buy it or not..as a matter of a fact , Id prefer thjat you trade opposit me , that way you would be gone in a week.