Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : fhtv Fisher Television Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RSkarsten who wrote (382)	10/20/1999 1:10:00 AM
From: VoyK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 641

Russ, he found time to place the arrogant PR. A less arrogant one would have taken probably less time. There must be other reasons, but I strongly feel that it is not a fraud. I spent a few years in a third world country and I know, that if you are only suspected of being on the wrong side of the law you end up in jail until the trial. If this company has local unhappy investors and they are high and dry at $1+, I bet they are already noisy. Bill Fisher must feel very strong and be ready to answer any questions. He seems to be provoking the market. Perhaps it is a cheap way to promote the stock. Consider an impact of a good news after this outrage.

To: RSkarsten who wrote (382)	10/20/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: Michael E. Baldino	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 641

Russ, your points are valid. But if the so called leaked information was an issue he wanted to go away, it would not take much...time or effort which is my point. also I might ad, If vannessa and roy were the Investor relations dept. It would enhance their job to have someone such as myself willing to work for free to help promote the company. You are right..he may be very busy with more pending matters. depsite my extensive background in broadcasting, I am at a loss for speculating on numbers here. I also make the above statement because apparently he has had time to speak to investors on the phone. someone said to me for a public company, they are not too public. which leads me to think and only think that if he plans on becoming a private company, then he would have to purchase on the open market a large percentage of the public float if I am not mistaken. someone gave me the figure of 95%. (correct me if am wrong anyone) now with 4.6 million in the float at a dollar a share, this would be 4.6 million dollars ....so by laying low and out of site, with a share price of .20 lets say, he can buy back the float for somewhere around 920,000.00 ish nice huh? again this is only a suspicion that I have and of course I may be way off. <---reread that please!!! of course by no PR's or other attention the lower share price is more realistic...this is the only reason I can come up with for a CEO to want to lay this low. Also he may want to gobble up the shares so that when things really start to cook , he can give them out as part of aquisition deals without causing anykind of dilution to the float.....well folks probably my wild imagination!!!!