To: Jeffry K. Smith who wrote (32372 ) 10/20/1999 1:42:00 AM From: pompsander Respond to of 93625
All is riddles at this point. However, there may be a little light showing through the haze. Let's see... 1. Coppermine/Carmel launch seems on time, on track by all accounts. Intel could not afford a problem with this one after Camino, so you have to think it is gonna go ultra smooth. 2. While Rambus benefits from Carmel, it only does so by a ratio (I believe I read) of about 1/8 as much as it would from Camino...the diff being the volume/price equation for the mainline systems and the workstation/server systems. 3. However, if Carmel launches successfully, then Rambus is finally operating successfully in a mainline personal computing environment. At last. 4. So, while the Camino enigma drags on, both Intel and Rambus need to find a way to reach back (from carmel) to the mainstream market which was to be served by Camino (and may still at some undisclosed date). So, as speculated, Intel develops Carmel lite, backing into a more expensive but satisfactory solution to the gap problem it has created in its product lines. Rambus goes along for the ride. 5. So, if this is likely, or even possible, then isn't the roadmap working out exactly as most anticipated it would? Rambus enters the market on the "high" end, gravitates down to the mainstream level and, with Timna, enters the economy models in a year or so. Now, the leaks from the Dell catalog showed that Rambus/Camino systems were going to be reasonably priced. We may lose that advantage in a Carmel/lite environment, but is this different than what many of us were assuming would be the price points a few months ago? 6. Are we really in a very different place than what was anticipated a few months ago. Not a smooth road, but maybe still a successful one. It all depends on Intel.