Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Millstream Mines (MLSM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumell who wrote (391)	10/20/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: RICK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 664

Brumell, Could you walk us through the rough estimates. (This would be in your own opinion) I think you know more than most when it comes to the mining industry. We appreciate your posts and honesty. Rick

To: Brumell who wrote (391)	10/20/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: Dirtpoor	Respond to of 664

Hi Brumell, AS always, I am very happy to hear from you. Your posts are always informative and intelligently written! When I wrote my last post, I knew that you would "step up to the plate". There is no humanly way that you could have resisted and simply ignored that oxymoron and not answered! Of course you obviously realize that an oxymoron is a figure of speech with words of opposite meaning, set together for emphasis or effect and not necessarily a grammatical error, but who cares anyway! Yes, one of my questions was with regard to there being any potential at all. Your geological explanation addresses that question, however, I was wondering if anybody else sees any other way to explain what they mean when they refer to the "potential" of the property or the company, especially so now in light of your explanation of the lack of it. Lastly, can anyone who has the figures, do the math and tell us the value of the shares at present? This might help us to gauge the situation and do some damage control, if that boat hasn't already sailed! Regards, Dirtpoor