To: Rande Is who wrote (13763 ) 10/20/1999 4:51:00 PM From: Jon Stept Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
Rande, re:is the consumer happier... Well, it depends how you define happiness. I hope you are not confusing your social nostalgia with economic nostalgia, if the two can be separated, which is a discussion all it's own. I would think it is easy to confuse the two. It is like asking are consumers any better off? And when you start asking those questions, you enter the world of consumerism and social studies. I mean, the consumer now, of the middle class, can have way more than they could have at a material level then they could have years ago. Right? Electricity, plumbing, lights, TV, radio, washing machine, medicine, any food they want just about. Would they not be happier with all of these conveniences... are they materially better off... don't you think so? If these conveniences did not come along with a reduction in the quality of life, I am not sure you would be saying this. I am not sure how the quality of life is relates to this countries consumer or social dynamics. Working longer hours, the disappearance of the housewife, latchkey kids, the diminishing presence of the nuclear family, a cynical, skeptical voting public... it is hard to disentangle that from the rise of the faceless corporation. But I don't think the two are close to synonymous. If you are having fit of nostalgia... I understand. If you didn't have that fit of nostalgia, it wouldn't be progress... they go hand in hand. But don't you think your this recent move by IBM is a nostalgia sink for you... an economic nostalgia trigger and you are responding to both from an economic, and social, standpoint? Just my opinion. Jon :)