SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ITV Games Inc. V.TVE (Formerly Border Capital) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spark who wrote (65)10/21/1999 3:12:00 PM
From: Boolish  Respond to of 137
 
Border and Dion legal update from BingoNet corrected

Border Capital Corp BOP
Shares issued 21,267,221 Oct 20 close $0.45
Thu 21 Oct 99 Correction
Also Dion Entertainment Corp (DIO)
Mr. William Krohley of BingoNet reports
BingoNet Inc. hereby corrects its news release dated Oct. 20, 1999. The position statement concerning Border being in breach
of the March 25, 1999, purchase and sale agreement, should properly have referred to Border
Capital (Nevada) Corporation, a subsidiary of Border Capital Corp.
(c) Copyright 1999 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com



To: Spark who wrote (65)10/21/1999 10:09:00 PM
From: Boolish  Respond to of 137
 
A good post from a guy who knows his shite over on Stockhouse.

Ooooooohhhhhh!!!

Such a big secret!!!

if you knew what people close to the situation knew you would have covered by now...........

Prophet1, if you think that many people don't know what's going on with DIO re: the TV show, you are sadly mistaken (once
again).

The question is: Is it more of the DIO hype and BS, or will they actually get something signed in LA this time???
Yeah, yeah, I know. Everybody's down there - so there must be a reason, right??? Well...maybe, but maybe not. "Big News"
coming. "Big TV deal". "Big financing deal". We've heard it all before.

I'm not in the inner circle of DIO by a long shot, yet I've heard the same stories. It's not such a "closely held" secret. People
talk. There are no secrets.

You may not believe this, but as much as I enjoy poking fun at you guys , I hope you get your deal. Why wouldn't I? I'm not
short DIO. I'm long BOP. Big difference. My wishes are for the injunction to be dismissed and for BOP to get
financing/acquire BingoNet, and rollout some deals of their own. The only reason I care about DIO is because of the
injunction/arbitration. They did rain on BOP's parade, so they deserve a bit of pain in return!!! hehehee.

=============================================

Within a few days, we'll all know about the judge's verdict on the injunction, so there's no point in getting into a shouting match
about it. We'll know soon enough.

If BOP loses, it's obviously a major setback. At the very least, they will be on hold until arbitration. Worst case, they'll have to
worry about the rights reverting to BingoNet and fight to keep them. If BOP prevails, they'll proceed with their original plans,
and also be free to put the hammer to DIO over certain issues.

One of those issues will be whether or not DIO needs the patents for the TV show. Maybe they need them, maybe they don't.
I sure as hell don't know, but neither does anyone else. If DIO shareholders think it's a non-issue they are fooling themselves.
Trust me - BOP is going to push this issue. They'd be crazy not to. This could have a very negative effect on whatever TV deal
DIO might have lined up. I said could, not will.

Another issue, if BOP wins, will be seeking damages from the Dion Group and, by extension, DIO.

BOP has more on the line right now than DIO, but don't kid yourselves, DIO has a lot at stake too. If BOP wins the injunction,
the tables are going to quickly turn on DIO - TV deal or no TV deal. You guys can ignore BOP at your own peril. You can
think that the TV deal will solve all of DIO's problems, but you are dead wrong.



To: Spark who wrote (65)10/21/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: Boolish  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 137
 
Hey maybe I should ask to change what I wrote on the thread header. The only thing that is true anymore is the first sentence.

ROTFLOL...sort of.