SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (2540)10/21/1999 10:14:00 AM
From: tero kuittinen  Respond to of 34857
 
I think the digital handset radiation is a fraction of AMPS radiation. And the new 3210, 8850 and 8210 models have considerably lower radiation leves than the stub-antenna models. It would take the edge off the "news" magazine if they dwelled on technological improvements too much.

Tero



To: Lane3 who wrote (2540)10/21/1999 11:03:00 AM
From: Claude  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34857
 
My understanding (I could be corrected as I'm NO expert) is that digital sets emit much LESS radiation - especially CDMA handsets since it is a low power solution. There was talk by others about this on the QCOM thread.

Claude


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News