SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jeffbas who wrote (8710)10/21/1999 7:19:00 PM
From: Madharry  Respond to of 78651
 
Once again you have hit the nail on the head. This year I chose between two technology stocks- one had sharply accelerating sales but no book value. The other was selling for 1/2 of its bookvalue and seemed to have prospects for a turn around. I chose the latter because it appeared less risky. The former has quadrupled in value and the latter has lost a third of its value as it continues to "turn around".
The clincher is that I knew that the management of the latter company was questionable at best whereas I had no opinion on the former company. I shall try to remember those words in the future when I ponder a similar decision.



To: jeffbas who wrote (8710)10/22/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78651
 
Jeff,

Interesting comments about "value tech" investing.

Actually I was not thinking about this kind of hybrid approach in individual stock selection but rather a portfolio approach where say 50% would be in classic value plays and 50% in classic growth. I was wondering whether most of the value players here took a similar ecclectic (schizophrenic?) approach, or whether they simply scratch their heads when they look at the valuation of say a Cisco.

Sam