Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kolo55 who wrote (15370)	10/22/1999 1:32:00 PM
From: hcirteg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Something tells me those 200+ Nov 7 1/2 calls were bought by someone who felt they may be worth a wee bit more sooner than later... Nice move today and we keep stomping the ask... News? HC PS. Mooter...nice call last night on the CC conversion. OUIJI Board?

To: kolo55 who wrote (15370)	10/22/1999 2:18:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

"N O C O N V E R S I O N absent indications of an OEM contract. No OEM contract or news of a pending one w/in 2 weeks or 2 months or 2 years, no conversion w/in 2 weeks or 2 months or 2 years." Does anyone understand the implication of these two statements? The qualifier, "absent indications of an OEM", seems to conflict with the second statement. Taken together, one would conclude that he believes there will be no conversion for at least two years. Paul, how do you interpret this? Visnic seems unwilling to elaborate.