Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mohan Marette who wrote (8800)	10/23/1999 3:45:00 AM
From: Nandu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12475

Since the 'commies' do not believe in Democracy the other two numbskulls -Congress & BJP- should have made sure they got enough protection in these 'hyper sensitive' constituencies. Anyway I don't think they would have won the election in Kannur and Kasargod even with the 'proetction' as I think the commies are quite popular in those parts anyway,no? The reason the commies used these tactics is that they are losing support and they know it. Their victory margin in Kannur was only in the 6000 range. The rigging probably made the difference there. Anyway, using force to gain power is the basic philosophy of the commies. For example, in the colleges in Kerala, the SFI is much stronger than the KSU, disproportionate to the support their parent parties have in the general population. Why? Because those who don't join the SFI are threatened and sometimes beaten up. This is known as "organizational strength".