To: Matthew L. Jones who wrote (31136 ) 10/22/1999 9:51:00 PM From: pater tenebrarum Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
Matt, good argument...however, buying value in this market has been a losing proposition for quite some time now. i'm not sure if the value stuff will recover concurrently with a break in the overpriced stocks...more likely it will get even cheaper before turning around. otoh, i agree with you that some stocks look extremely cheap on a relative basis and one is tempted to look for them bottoming out. as for the 1% EMA, as Vitas has pointed out, it is more likely to bottom in the vincinity of -100 (the '57 low) in the course of a final washout. in a true relentless bear market it can go a lot lower...look at the 1930's bear if you don't believe it. liquidity? the Fed is starting to drain liquidity from the system, both by raising rates and through open market ops. of late. rising interest rates may well begin to cut off the second biggest source of liquidity, namely corporate buybacks, which are largely debt-financed, much to the detriment of corporate America's balance sheets. a falling dollar may curtail the biggest source, which are foreign funds. individual investors rank a distant third as a source of liquidity, and last i heard they are maxed out on mortgages, credit card debt, and margin debt. last but not least rising yields on riskless treasury bills and only slightly riskier notes and bonds are more and more looking like serious competition for stocks...as i have mentioned before, at some point there is a cut-off that may lead to sudden asset re-allocation moves being enacted. a first whiff of this was evident last Friday... let me conclude by saying that i do see your point and i have begun to nibble on some value stocks myself...with the result that i now realize that i shouldn't have<ggg>. they will come back, but it will require a lot of patience imo. we can agree on one point: the next major rally will likely be led by value. regards, hb