To: Janice Shell who wrote (24154 ) 10/23/1999 4:51:00 PM From: Hogger Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26163
Jancie, Jancie, Jancie, ...When I spoke with A Mann's attorney earlier today, he said that there had been no agreement, and that both the Judge and the Magistrate agreed with him that Andy should be able to have the summary judgement set aside any time he wanted to. This is indeed what I posted ... now, please tell me that the second part of this compound sentence could be taken seriously by anyone ... it is absolutely the height of sarcasm, a tool you use daily. If Mann has an attorney, it is a rather recent development, because he did not previously defend himself. Forget it Jancie, you blew it this time ... who I may or may not have called it totally outside the realm of importance ... the important aspect of this entire matter (from which you are going to any length to deflect attention) is, "if you received such information, from whom did it come, or did you just 'invent it yourself?" That's all that matters.Wrong again, Hogger. I posted that I'd heard a settlement had been reached. - My emphasis added. It seems that you hear a lot. I'm remembering some of what you "heard" about CYGS and their management. In this case, you would have had to have heard it from someone who was very close to the matter if you were going to post it and that would be violating the court rules, or you heard it from someone who was using you ... ala JJ on occasion, and that would mean that you were being very reckless. This is one of the dangers of being a vigilante ... you are not held to any standards other than those which are self imposed, and they appear to be very flexible, depending upon who you are attacking, or who you are supporting. Hogger