Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11977)	10/24/1999 8:12:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, <<Would you take a 25% increment>> One would not even need to take a discount under the circumstances that occurred. Dick: Bob, I will find some supporters that will help us, I only thought since you were so supportive in the past I would give you the opportunity. Bob: Opportunity, what opportunity? All I can see is the stock price going down. Dick: I will find someone to help us, we are so close to success. If you think about it, you could recover most of the current value of your stock and buy back restricted at maybe 1/2 of the value you receive. I was just hoping you would be the supporter we need so desperately. Bob: Well if you are determined to have someone sell to raise cash I know that the stock price will be driven down. I may as well be the one that helps you. I'm glad to be of such help. <VBG> PS, The stock started at $0.12, may end at $0.04 - 0.05, 1/2 the value. 50% or more automatic gain in restricted would sure be worth the play IMO.

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (11977)	10/25/1999 8:23:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, <<shares should bounce back soon>> I agree that will be the test of my funds raising theory. The thread and message board's chat seems to have formed conciseness that the weakness is simply shorting. Then the selling will continue. If your information is correct and new funding isn't required to production, there should be a good short covering rally as that's understood. I find it hard to understand on how anyone would simply short Global as a regular market action at current price unless they had proof positive that the new process won't work. History would forecast a won't work outcome, but technology breakthroughs often occur after many failed attempts. The proof that the process wouldn't work would have to be very strong and maybe from information by the suppliers. Irrespective of the current message board thinking, the theory I still favor is that it's a Jensen induced fund raising activity.