Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PaperChase who wrote (71454)	10/24/1999 7:45:00 AM
From: accountclosed	Respond to of 86076

your perspective does not offend me. people swearing on the thread does not offend me. your posting style offends nearly everyone on the thread.

To: PaperChase who wrote (71454)	10/24/1999 9:49:00 AM
From: Oblomov	Respond to of 86076

At one point, didn't you claim to be a lawyer? Maybe I am just imagining this. Maybe I am just inferring it from your handle, "Paperchase," which is, I assume, both a reference to the act of trading stocks and to the 70s television show of that name. If you are a lawyer, then you certainly know that nowhere in the Constitution is there a right to objectivity. CNBC, for example, is not required to present both sides of the bull/bear debate, and they seldom do. Similarly, while there is no ownership claim on this thread, there is also no requirement of objectivity. This doesn't mean that we wouldn't be tolerant of an opposing viewpoint. But, you should be cognizant of the majority viewpoint here, and at least respect it. To this point, you have acted like the guy who attends a wedding reception with a group of African-Americans, and asks when the watermelon is going to be served. The majority here have been insulted rather than amused. So, as far as I'm concerned, anyone with an bullish viewpoint is welcome here, as long as they have a sense of humor and are not snide and insulting to the majority. AA