Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (76681)	10/24/1999 5:10:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573430

Jim - RE: "Here's the benchmarks..." OOOPS, I forgot the link! I guess I was so unimpressed, I didn't care for the link. ;) Thanks.

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (76681)	10/24/1999 8:03:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573430

CuLate benchmarks, two funny notes: 1. "What happened? I am not sure at all! I don't want to jump to conclusions...Seems like Stream doesn't like the bigger buffers of the Coppermine." - it is not that Stream does not like Cum buffers, just Cum buffers are not big enough for the real application...! CuM fails flat on the STREAM memory benchmark. (Ouch, I mean i820 Rambust fail....) :) 2. "The Coppermine inside the testmachine was a 667 MHz one, overclocked to 733 MHz (no multiplier lock)!" What? Intel does not have enough 733 parts to send samples to reviewers? Cool...