SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DownSouth who wrote (8735)10/24/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: JohnG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Freeus. There are some that see AMD catching up with Intel chips B4 bandwidth is great enough to make a 900MHZ chip more useful than a 300MHZ chip in most cases. Thus falling computer/chip prices and shrinking margins & desparite leap to wireless. They may have run out of rope without either more bandwidth, voice activated software, or something that burns more CPU capacity.
JohnG



To: DownSouth who wrote (8735)10/24/1999 7:01:00 PM
From: freeus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
why not include intc?
Big sighs.
I will include Intel now....I have been burned by it: holding for long periods with "dead" money only to sell and have it go up,not buying back in, seeing it go up drastically, etc etc....
Sometimes a stock does that to you...but I agree the barriers to entry at this point are enormous...but buy in at what price? The semi sector seems to be so cyclical, and (I think but have not done stats to prove it) tanks worse than all other tech sectors.
Freeus



To: DownSouth who wrote (8735)10/25/1999 12:46:00 AM
From: Stoctrash  Respond to of 54805
 
...you have a good point.
Look at all of INTC's other investments as well...and ones that will be...