SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (76684)10/24/1999 6:21:00 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572704
 
Elmer, Athlon TOTALLY DESTROYS Coppermine and Carmel...

You posted some SPEC scores where some compiler tweaks were used for Coppermine that weren't used for Athlon. Now take a look at what happens when they run the same code:

Bapco SYSmark for NT:

AMD 650 - 584
AMD 700 - 607
INTC 667 - 310
INTC 733 - 330

intc scores from www.intel.com
amd scores from www.amd.com

Bapco is real world applications benchmark - it actually runs a mixture of Microsoft Office apps, Corel, and a few others. This is how the processors perform on real applications instead of arbitrary benchmarks with one CPU using compiler tweaks and the other not using compiler tweaks. This is what happens when both run the same code.

To tell you the truth, I'm a little surprised by this huge difference, but it's hard to argue with the two manufacturer sites. Maybe you can check them out and identify some configuration differences - I didn't see any significant ones, other than Intel was using a workstation class motherboard with two rambus channels while AMD was using plain old PC100.

Dan



To: Elmer who wrote (76684)10/24/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572704
 
RE:"Coppermine and Carmel TOTALLY DESTROYS Athlon"...

Por Athlon, totally destroyed by Intels "benchmarks". <G>



To: Elmer who wrote (76684)10/24/1999 7:01:00 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 1572704
 
Elmer,
re:"Coppermine and Carmel TOTALLY DESTROYS Athlon"

you mean the MIAalumnimine and Caramel?

ROTFLMAO

AMD Athlon, still THE FASTEST PC PROCESSOR IN THE WORLD!

amd.com

The last time I looked, iNTEL couldn't get a chipset out the door!

sTAY tOOOned!

Mysef



To: Elmer who wrote (76684)10/25/1999 2:20:00 AM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572704
 
Elmer,

Remember or little talk about SSE enhanced compilers.. yep.. you guessed it.. Intel used an enhanced compiler and sharky (of all people) said so right out in the open. So sorry..

Steve