Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (69810)	10/24/1999 8:33:00 PM
From: rupert1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Andreas: The v-call broadcast was timed 11 a.m. on Friday. It may have been taped earlier - I don't know. That was about the time that CPQ share price started to weaken - in the first hour it had gained. I don't know if it is a case of "post hoc ergo propter hoc". The v-com words were different from the CNBC interview earlier in the week. Less than a year ago, Niles recommended CPQ somewhere in the $40's; he then recommended it as a BUY when it was $23 earlier this year. He gets paid to collect and anlayse information. After a stock has fallen 62% from its high (and he still had a STRONG BUY on it at its high), he should be able to do better than to repeat a cliche about a falling knife, or that zero is the only sure bottom, or that everyone thought the DEC problems were accommodated in the price when it was $50, $40 and $30. You can find much more informed and intellgient comments than that here. All his comments last week were spiced with self-congratulatory remarks about how he was the only one to call the IBM slowdown. He has now put himself in a positon respecting COMPAQ where he can say his "disastorous" comment were a warning (even though he has not changed his BUY recommendation) or they referred to COMPAQ's lowered expectations since earlier this year. But given his interest in his reputation, I think he will claim that the COMPAQ numbers will reveal a potential slowdown in sales in its DEC products, whatever MC says. If the figures are disastorous or even bad it would have been nice if Niles or other analysts could have told us what they would be. It is easy to be clever when someone inside a company is feeding you figures. It looks like MC control of the company has starved Niles and others of the easy route and they have not been able to generate any numerical analysis left to their own devices.

To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (69810)	10/24/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

El-- yes but cpq will not be on anyones lover list for a long time. As long as there are companies that can make WS a buck and allowing them to sleep at night they will (not totally) shun those that kicked them hard,, but will not crawl into bed with them either. This is the second kick in 3 years and the worst. Why go here when there are other places just as good and more trustworthy,, not to mention upfront, open and candid. Hell-- I tell everyone it is a bargain down here,,, but would not buy a share unless I get the same deal as MC. I will put grant money into it,, but not mine. We shall see how long those in close to 50 take to recover,,, many will not live to see it