Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Baba 2 who wrote (43733)	10/24/1999 9:16:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

Baba 2 I don't kid when it comes to tops. I wasn't kidding when I said to this thread that they are playing into the shorters hands weeks ago, and I wasn't kidding when I advised people to exit. You may well see a higher limit tried... but rest assured, it's nearly over. Back in 1998 we had the same comments:{And many wanted to rub my nose in it then} So I shall refresh you all: Thursday, Apr 2 1998 4:05PM ET #reply-3935920 No party today, back to work. Time to buy gold? Tuesday, Apr 7 1998 11:39AM ET #reply-3985357 I disagree, I say gold does not CLEAR $320. But will sink below $300 in the near term. And I also believe that although TA is not 100%, it's more correct than most want to give credit to it.... But Elliot wave analysis is bunk {can be applied to everything, everywhere} Thursday, Apr 23 1998 2:38PM ET #reply-4179936 I say gold does not CLEAR $320. But will sink below $300 in the near term. I see this GOLD run as fears over EU. In a short while, down! members.home.net Note, the POG didn't break that $320 mark all year. So I rest easy that some day you'll attempt to rub my nose in it. Hutch PS: Maybe if this thread knew how to accurately value a company, commodity... they'd all be happier?