Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (43735)	10/25/1999 8:01:00 AM
From: Robert Dirks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116759

Great article by PATRICK BLOOMFIELD - KUWAIT/WASHINGTON Conspiracy and BILL MURPHY mentioned again: Monday, October 25, 1999 Foresight at times can be fooled Plausible scenario for why Kuwait is lending gold reserves Patrick Bloomfield National Post Nothing is ever as it seems. A week ago, this oh-so-prescient columnist was talking of the Standard & Poor's 500 composite index possibly flirting with the low 1100s. Appearances to the contrary, the S&P headed north instead. It resumed nodding acquaintance with its 200-day moving average as it moved marginally above 1300 this past Friday. Just maybe, the bull is not as dead as he is sometimes made out to be. And wasn't this past week notable for the news Kuwait was going to help out those hard-pressed short sellers in gold bullion by lending out the 79 tonnes in its gold reserves through the Bank of England? As I said, nothing is ever as it seems. Rather than a win for the shorter sellers, the news could be something between neutral and a plus for gold bugs. After all, Kuwait is a gold bug, too. The Kuwait Investment Authority is now the largest shareholder in Thistle Mining Inc., a Toronto global mining-finance company specializing in precious metals. The authority acquired its major interest earlier this year by swapping its two-thirds holding in a private French company called CIDEM for treasury shares in Thistle. That little gem of information was originally brought to the public's notice by writer Paul Kaihla in Canadian Business magazine and repeated last week in a commentary by one Bill Murphy of Dallas (whom I introduced to readers last week) on his fun-filled Web site Cafe le Metropole (www.lemetropolecafe.com). Thistle's president, Scotland's Willie McLucas (that is how he signs himself), said no more in his last president's report than that Thistle's new largest shareholder would be an outfit called International Civil Co. But the notes to the accounts were a little more explicit. It seems the company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Kuwait Investment Authority. It will acquire 345 million Thistle treasury shares in the swap. (The last interim report mentioned only 34.5 million, which I assume was a typo.) Mr. Murphy surmises that the possible explanation for the Kuwait gold-lending decision might run something like this: Begin with the assumption that U.S. officialdom (together with some very worried folk on Wall Street) is all too keen to get the word out that the fallout from the past stampede to sell gold short is now under control. So Washington seeks to muscle Kuwait into going along with this scenario by selling gold. But the Kuwaitis, who were not born yesterday, go along only as far as lending the stuff. That script sounds plausible to me, and suggests that not everybody has been cowed by apparent muscle-flexing to keep gold prices in tow. Certainly the top guys at Newmont Mining Co. and Canada's Placer Dome Inc. made it clear at the Denver Gold Conference last week that they regard the more likely gold price trend to be upward -- over time. If they were talking to their book, so have the big names in the gold bullion markets who have a vested interest in getting the word out that the big squeeze is over and that, any way, central bankers are standing by to help. This fascinating battle could well put both a temporary floor and a ceiling on gold. Meanwhile I am indebted to a knowledgeable reader in Quebec for letting me glance at a copy of the August, 1999, "Gold & Silver Hedge Outlook" by Ted Reeve and Susan Muir of Scotia Capital Markets. Among other things, I learned from this excellent research document that the following companies did not appear to have any output hedged at the time of publication: Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. (AGE/TSE), Battle Mountain Gold Co., whose exchangeable shares are listed in Canada (BMC/TSE), Boliden Ltd. (BOL/TSE), Cathedral Gold Corp. (CAT/TSE), Franco-Nevada Mining Corp. (FN/TSE), Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. (FCX.A/NYSE), Goldcorp Inc. (G/TSE), High River Gold Mines Ltd. (HRG/TSE), Manhattan Minerals Corp. (MAN/TSE), Miramar Mining Corp. (MAE/TSE), Pioneer Metals Corp. (PSM/TSE) and Repadre Capital Corp. (RPD/TSE). That does not necessarily make them gold picks. But it is one of many factors to be kept in mind. Patrick Bloomfield, a Financial Post regular contributor, invests in securities and may hold issues mentioned in the column.

To: long-gone who wrote (43735)	10/25/1999 8:44:00 AM
From: Rarebird	Respond to of 116759

Rising Inflation ultimately leads to an Erosion in Confidence in Government and Government-sponsored Money: Stayin' alive By Dr. Irwin Kellner, CBS MarketWatch Last Update: 9:43 AM ET Oct 22, 1999 Kellner's forecast NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Just when you thought it was safe to assume that inflation was dead and buried, it seems to have come back to haunt us one more time. "Inflation has once again reared its ugly head -- and I have to tell you, it's even worse than it looks." Dr. Irwin Kellner Yes, folks, add another I-word to the market's list of concerns. See my column of Oct 19. Besides interest rates, it's now inflation. Although still running at a low pace compared with the bad old days of the early 1990s -- not to say the double-digit rates of the early 1980s -- the rate of price increases has been slowly but surely creeping up. From a low of 1.4 percent during the 12 months ending in September 1998, the pace of price hikes at the consumer level has jumped to 2.6 percent in the most recent 12 months. That's almost double last year's rate, with no reason to expect a slowdown anytime soon. As you know, our economy is stretched tight as a drum, while other economies appear to be picking up as well. At the same time, the dollar has weakened, leading to higher prices for imported merchandise. Back home, the jobless rate is plumbing 30-year lows, leading to a pickup in wage increases that is outstripping productivity gains. On the commodity front, crude oil prices have doubled since March, producing substantial hikes in the prices of gasoline, heating oil, and electricity. Other prices have shot up, too, witness September's jump in wholesale prices. Don't ignore 'special factors' I know that if you take out food, energy, cars, and tobacco, September's increase in wholesale prices drops to 0.1 percent. But why stop there? Take out everything that went up and you're left with a decline! The fact is, we use all of these items, so it's foolish to eliminate any or all of them just because they behaved counter to expectations. It seems that each month "special factors" inflate the inflation numbers, yet we are being told by the pundits not to hyperventilate about them, because they are "short-term aberrations." Underlying trend Well, pilgrims, guess what? The short term has now become the underlying trend, and it's not pretty. Inflation has once again reared its ugly head -- and I have to tell you, it's even worse than it looks. Prices of everyday items (excluding such infrequently-purchased goods as motor vehicles, homes and household furnishings) have been rising faster than the top-line consumer price index since the beginning of 1997. This represents the true cost of living for the average household. By my calculations, the 12-month rise in prices of such goods as food, clothing, apparel, medical care, education and personal care has not dipped below 2-1/2 percent in recent memory. Today, prices of these items as a group are up by three percent from last September -- one of the fastest rates of increase in the past seven years. So unless the stock market tanks, it looks as though the Federal Reserve will have to remove the punch bowl by raising rates next month. The party is getting too exuberant -- and it's not even New Year's Eve.