SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (32777)10/25/1999 3:25:00 AM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
Re: quite a measurable difference on a lot of the benchmarks....

Come on Tenchusatsu, the performance of coppermine was an overall surprise on the upside, but the performance of Rambus is the opposite. PC 800 is binsplitted out and isn't even realistic for use in a real world test. Dell isn't planning on shipping anything faster than PC700 since that's all that can be reliably produced right now. Meanwhile PC133 is so easy to make that it's your choice, same price, for it or PC100. Yet these tests compare PC100 with Rambus 800 and in almost all of them, PC100 on a CPU clocked 33MHZ faster more than makes up the difference between PC100 and Rambus 800. What do you think would be the result of a comparison of PC133 and Rambus 700? - that's what exists in the real world right now.

You should be happy! With its terrific new cache, coppermine has caught up with Athlon in Integer, and just about caught up in floating point - much to everyone's surprise.

Dan



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (32777)10/25/1999 11:19:00 AM
From: dumbmoney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
But don't bother telling me again that there is no difference between 820/RDRAM and 440BX/SDRAM, because you're wrong.

It's fair to say the difference is small, even when using the fastest RDRAM speed grade. When using the 600/700 speed grades, RDRAM is actually slower than PC100 on some tests (Win98 business).

This could be counted as a modest success, if only RDRAM cost the same as SDRAM.