Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (76767)	10/25/1999 3:04:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570187

tejek - <If Charles comments are "absolute Bullsht" and his inside sources are not well placed, then prove it. And before you come back with a statement that you are under some kind of agreement to keep quiet, then please don't make such strong statements that you can't back up.> I could ask him the exact same thing. I am absolutely saying that where I am at, where both the process and the Coppermine design is actually developed*, we do not concede the MHz race. How the hell am I suppose to prove that, any more than Charles can prove his source's veracity? I'm not saying Charles is lying. What I am saying is that his sources do not seem to be in the loop. I have indicated this frequently in the past. PB