Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (76825)	10/25/1999 1:06:00 PM
From: Gary Ng	Respond to of 1570746

tejek, Re: Your claim may, in fact, be true but neither you nor PB back up your claims with facts, just speculation. So how do you expect your voices to be more credible. I believe PB has been saying that Coppermine would compete nicely for some time and the released figures do support his claim some how. However, just as PB said, believe what you like to believe. Time will tell. I incline to believe him. Gary

To: tejek who wrote (76825)	10/25/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: Saturn V	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570746

Ref- <Your claim may, in fact, be true but neither you nor PB back up your claims with facts, just speculation. So how do you expect your voices to be more credible.> You should monitor the past credibility of Process Boy.[ Read his old posts.] All his claims have all come to pass. I am not an Intel insider, but an avid Intel watcher, and most of my assertions have been valid as well. The best indicator of the future performance of an individual is his past performance. And I do have faith in Process Boy's assertions.