Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECU Silver Mining Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: baystock who wrote (530)	10/25/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 672

Ah ... i'm starting to click to what's up your kilt - some sort of nationalistic flag-waving, eh ... well, i'm not particularly interested. Have to go out now, until much later. My two countries have you surrounded already, anyway, so who cares. But before i go, permit me one wild guess - This SSC you're .... um, would the word be 'touting' ... would there perhaps have been a point in its development of its 'Argentine project' when it had not completed a full feasibility study? ... if so, then by your logic, that would be a red white 'n blue flag, n'est ce pas?

To: baystock who wrote (530)	10/25/1999 9:22:00 PM
From: jgibbs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 672

Ram, When you spout off posting that ECU is "penny trash" and that investors should look elsewhere, you put yourself in the same boat as someone who touts the buying of the stock, only at the other end. You are touting the avoidance or the selling of the stock. Man, your cajones are as big as theirs. How will you feel if the stock zooms and you are responsible for someone changing his mind about buying on the strength of your certainty. I'm up over 30% this year on ECU which may be trash to you but not to me by a long shot. I pay little attention to hype but look for fundamental information upon which to judge. Why don't you do the same and keep your opinions to yourself.

To: baystock who wrote (530)	10/26/1999 12:30:00 AM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 672

<<By the way SSC has done a full feasibility study on their Argentina project.>> And they suggested about 100M ounces and multi-millions ounces potential production way before feasibility study was completed. BAY is exactly on the same track. Except that Alamo Dorado appears to be an even better project than Pirquitas. I like Pirquitas a lot. don't misunderstand me and I sure hope that Sunshine will solve its financial problems. The good thing is that BAY only has 11M shares outstanding and no financial problems.