Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rupert1 who wrote (70021)	10/26/1999 7:41:00 AM
From: Elwood P. Dowd	Respond to of 97611

victor... I think "fat boy" is an imposter, but ron posts here occasionally. El >>> To: jopawa (1903 ) From: ron insana Tuesday, Oct 20 1998 10:19PM ET Reply # of 3868 We have some pretty tight restrictions on stock ownership at CNBC. Our conflict of interest policies are very similar to those of the Wall Street Journal or other business news organizations. In many ways, our restrictions are similar to those of securitites firms and securities law firms as well. I have always personally felt that if we (business journalists) wanted to trade stocks we should work for money management firms or brokerage houses. For me, personally, I do not feel comfortable being active in the stock market when it is altogether possible I may find myself conflicted by any news that could affect my personal finances. I am not even comfortable having an impact on stocks I do not own. While not trying to overstate the case, business journalists have an increasing influence over the markets they cover. Limiting conflicts seems like the most appopriate way to handle the responsibilities we have to our viewers. By the way, thanks for the support from those who addressed recently raised issues about perceived biases. Enjoy this thread a great deal. Look forward to chatting more in the future. regards, ron