Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Bring Back Cobalt Blue- Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: re3 who wrote (382)	10/26/1999 6:39:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1264

<<this is nuts...a situation rectified but we must still maintain a five day penalty...>> Read it again, posting personal information on another person is normally a 14 day time out. I'm writing SI demanding she get the full 14 day suspension......so she gets off the box and gets her yard terracing done before winter sets in.

To: re3 who wrote (382)	10/26/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: accountclosed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1264

i'm just glad she's coming back. (edit: and hope you stay, too)

To: re3 who wrote (382)	10/26/1999 7:36:00 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1264

Gosh, you're harsh. Look, the man has to make some gesture of reprimand, and a five day suspension (actually seven, with credit for two served), down from permanent termination, is so benign! I got suspended for five days a couple of years ago for calling someone (who complained that it violated the TOU) "petty." A five day suspension is a good thing! You'd be amazed at how much work you get done. I wish I could be suspended for five days. Well, three. Maybe.