Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19886)	10/26/1999 8:53:00 PM
From: john	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Hey where's my McHappy meal, saw no mention of a financing.............

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19886)	10/26/1999 9:18:00 PM
From: Coz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Hi Mike, glad to see you made it home safely and.... smiling! Thanks for your report on the AGM. I'm looking forward to hearing more later on. It sure sounds like there will still be plenty to go around even with the newly authorized shares in the picture now. I appreciate you sharing with us your geologic exchanges Ian, Doppler, and Jones. --Coz

To: Mike Gold who wrote (19886)	10/27/1999 1:02:00 PM
From: James Randall Ingram	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

Medinah should have a much better idea if the Nasdaq merger is going to fly after the meeting. Mike, I don't see why the Nasdaq merger is necessarily a good thing. In fact, it's very easy to see it as something just the opposite. The only reason i see to do a merger is if the Nasdaq company can provide the cash to complete the drilling. If the IP results are as stunning as many think, there should be no trouble forming a JV with one of the majors. In that case, i see no advantage in doing a merger instead. What if the Nasdaq company IS one of the majors? Again. Wouldn't a JV be preferable to a merger? So, IF the Nasdaq merger isn't a good thing, what could be the opposite? How about a reverse split disguised in the form of a reverse merger? How about a reverse merger which allows Medinah to take on a new identity and hide its past from future investors? I'm not saying that any of this will happen or even that evil intent exists on the part of Medinah; I'm saying that too many "next weeks" have given Medinah a huge credibility problem. You said you would be standing at the front of the room at the AGM with a scowl on your face or at the back of the room with a smile. It's obvious you're smiling. It isn't obvious to me why. Every thing i've heard from the AGM so far just sounds like the same old same old. I'm not sure how the tone of these written words will play on the internet so let me assure you this is not a personal diatribe against you.