Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: srvhap who wrote (24500)	10/27/1999 7:18:00 AM
From: KJ. Moy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29386

Tom, <<KJ did you or any of the other more knowledgeable posters inform ANCR of this report and ask the relevant questions? And did you ask ANCR to look at the report and consider responding?>> Management was unaware of the tests until today. They have confronted Keylabs and finally Keylabs admitted that they were funded by Brocade. The tests were not comparing apples to apples. The test results, however, may be true. Let me tell you, you can make up tests to favor one vendor over another easily. I've done vendor evaluations many times (not FC) and know that for a fact. What I usually did was to test all the parameters that were important to my company's needs and gave reports as objective as possible. The report itself was 108 pages long, professionally done. If I need a writer, Keylabs is my choice. Greg Reyes and Brocade are now the talk of the FC community. Keylabs look like fools, borderline unethical. IMO it will backfire. A few uninformed private investors may sell because of it. If you read this board, talk to your broker or just use your common sense, you would have found the truth. One more point, this is all my speculation, the heavy shorts in September may have come from some savvy informed traders who got winds of this report and was unaware of the fact that the tests were not testing the right stuff. KJ