SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (77294)10/27/1999 2:10:00 AM
From: Goutam  Respond to of 1572630
 
Petz,

Just to give you more info on DDR DIMMs - bits copied from a neat article on the upcoming memory technologies
ixbt-labs.com ____________

*** 1 ***
DDR DRAM is a pure evolution and not a revolution as Direct RDRAM proved to be. This memory type is based on the same principles, as SDRAM does, with the only difference that it has an additional number of important features. Firstly, it utilizes a more progressive synchronization, which is absent in SDRAM. Secondly, DDR uses DLL (delay-locked loop) to receive a DataStrobe signal, which implies that the data in the output contacts are accessible. Using DataSrtobe for each 16 outputs allows the controller a more exact data access and synchronization of the data incoming from different modules located in one bank.

*** 2 ***
The main distinctive feature of DDR DRAM compared to SDRAM is the possibility to transfer the data at both edges of the clock frequency signal similar to Direct RDRAM. And - here you can start applauding - as a result we get an automatic doubling of the peak bandwidth compared to that of SDRAM working at the same basic frequency.

*** 3 ***
Hyundai Electronics, which became the world's largest DRAM manufacturer having bought LG Semicon, estimated the future of DDR 266 and 800MHz Direct RDRAM as follows:
                                    DDR-PC266  Direct RDRAM
========= ============
Peak bandwidth... 2.1GB/s 1.6GB/s
Memory bus effective performance... 65% 85%
Effective bandwidth... 1.37GB/s 1.36GB/s
Looks far less impressive, actually. (According to VIA, the factual bandwidth of DDR266 and 800MHz DRDRAM makes 1.36 and 1.12GB/s correspondingly, however, we shouldn't regard this figures as objective since VIA may be pursuing interested motives;-) )

*** 4 ***
DDR DRAM is based on SDRAM and hence borrowed a lot of other features from its predecessor except its speed. For example, being much faster than Direct RDRAM, DDR consumes significantly less power. DDR 200 needs almost the same power as PC100 module.

The only drawback of the DDR is that its DIMM contacts are slightly different from those of SDRAM. Though they are of the same size, DIMM DDR has 184 contacts while DIMM SDRAM only 168. That's why unfortunately, any direct change to a new memory type turns out absolutely impossible. However, the problem seems to be solved by means of placing the slots for both: 168- and 184-contact DIMM modules. This idea is actually similar to the solution offered on the low-cost mainboards where you can see both: SIMM and DIMM slots.

Photo of a DDR DIMM: ixbt-labs.com

*** 5 ***

As for the price, again we repeat that it is likely to remain the same as that for SDRAM, because DDR manufacturing does not require any additional investments: the equipment, the tests and chip package used (TSOP) are more than enough. And as a result, unlike the situation with Direct RDRAM, DDR manufacturers are perfectly ready for mass production and all they wait for now is the mainboards.

And despite all the perturbations life takes its natural course - the course of evolution, and DDR II is already looming in the distance. Though we don't know anything particular about it yet, we may suppose that this time it will come to the bandwidth over 3GB/s. However, since this memory type is likely to be due only next year, we won't consider it now. Just take note and look forward to it.

____________________

At the end of the article, there are two tables - one showing the relative strengths/weaknesses of DRDRAM, DRDPC266 and SDRAM PC133 in different technical aspects, and the other showing the additional cost elements with DRDRAM solution over DDR SDRAMs.

Goutama



To: Petz who wrote (77294)10/27/1999 2:27:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr  Respond to of 1572630
 
Petz - RE: "I like that."

Thanks. I come up with whatever I can. ;)

For MerDUD's name change - I'm-Late-ium!

"How about PennyMine for the 128K version of Cu-Never-Mind."

PennyMine sounds good, but it may turn out to be a goldmine for Intel it performs really well w/SSE, but of course, at the cost of PIII sales (Kind of like the recent Q.)