Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (762)	10/27/1999 1:00:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3246

If that's how you rate 'em, then we should thank Hitler and Stalin even more than Truman!!! LOL btw, the Far East was hardly stabilized when Truman left. what about Mao? he stabilized things pretty good.

To: Neocon who wrote (762)	10/27/1999 10:39:00 PM
From: Michael M	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3246

Hi Neo! Hate to differ with The Founder of "Lions," but, I don't think HST had a clue about the Far East. I, frankly, would vote for MacArthur as THE important influence there. Aside from Mac's role in stabilizing (and benefiting from) Japan, his decisive initiative immediately following the war prevented the Soviets from claiming a major post-war role. Without MacArthur's action, Japan might have looked a lot like Germany after the war. Brief sketch of this in "American Caesar" - more elsewhere. The show-down between HST and Mac had it's roots long before the Korean war - in WWI, to be exact. Truman, as I recall, botched artillery cover for a difficult advance for a unit under MacArthur's command. There was a good deal of contempt and defensiveness built into their relationship. Although associated with great events, I view Truman as a prickly and poor antecedent of Gerald Ford. And, that's all I have to say abut the subject. For now.