SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Extremely Boring Discussions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Constant Reader who wrote (353)10/27/1999 3:22:00 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 410
 
I just tried to put up the link to the article in the Financial Times, but the window filled with code! I wonder why. Anyway, here is, pasted, a pathetic piece that could be subtitled Political Correctness Gone Mad. Though I know it's more complicated and sadder than that.

-------------------

South African employers fear
new laws
By Nicol Degli Innocenti in Johannesburg

South African
companies are bracing
themselves for a wave
of litigation from
disappointed job
candidates under
sweeping new
anti-discrimination legislation submitted
to parliament in Cape Town yesterday.

The new Promotion of Equality and
Prevention of Unfair Discrimination bill
seeks to widen the field of illegal
discrimination beyond race, sex, religion
and physical disability. The bill lists 25
categories, which include education,
married status and socio-economic
standing, and "any other ground".

The bill has been given the green light by
the cabinet and, if approved by
parliament, will come into effect next
February.

Penuell Maduna, justice minister, said
the objective of the bill was "the total
transformation of society from one
characterised by the inequalities and
injustices inherited from apartheid to one
where the universal principles of equality,
fairness, justice and human dignity apply
to every one".

Special "Equality Courts" will be set up
from next year at every High Court and
Magistrates' Court in South Africa to
adjudicate disputes. They will have the
power to award damages or order a
settlement. There is, however, a right of
appeal to the High Court.

The justice minister warned that "the
punishment will be severe". Businesses,
companies or financial institutions can
have their licences to operate withdrawn
if their discrimination record is not
deemed satisfactory. Companies found
guilty may also be blacklisted by the
State Tender Board.

Two aspects of the legislation, which has
been drafted by the Justice Department
and by the Human Rights Commission,
are particularly controversial. One is the
reversal of the onus of proof, which will
lie with the respondent.

Those accused of discrimination will be
assumed guilty until they can prove their
actions were "reasonable and justifiable".


The opposition Democratic party has
promised to fight the bill in parliament.
Tony Leon, its leader, said the bill
"tramples all over other worthwhile
principles, such as the right to privacy,
freedom of speech and the presumption
of innocence".

There is also serious concern in South
Africa that the law may be open to abuse
and lead to witch-hunts, as the concept
of "unfair" discrimination is by no means
clear-cut. If a bank refuses a loan, a
landlord a lease contract, an insurance
company cover to anyone because
unemployed or destitute, they can be
sued for unfair discrimination. The
employers' group Business South Africa
admits to being "very concerned" and
hopes that provisions will be subject to
"extensive negotiation".

Other business and employer
representatives were reluctant to speak
on the record for fear of appearing
unwilling to embrace the philosophy of
the "new South Africa".

Another controversy is brewing over
whether some clauses of the bill violate
freedom of expression, which would
make them unconstitutional.

The media, for example, will not be
allowed to refer to someone as "black",
"female", "wheelchair-bound" or even
"married" without obtaining that person's
prior consent.

[Edit: Capital will fly out of RSA faster than it already is.-- E]