Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (1211)	10/28/1999 9:41:00 AM
From: Hank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5582

Once again you twist the truth to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. Increased revenues doesn't mean squat if you're spending more than you make. Here's the EPS numbers: Year EPS 1996 -0.57 1997 -1.02 1998 -0.97 199 -0.18 (to date) Doesn't look like a proven money maker to me. Call me old fashioned but I like to see a positive year to year increase in net earnings before I invest in a company. GUMM is a net money loser. "Rumor has it that Gumtech is teaming up..." There you go again with innuendo and that crystal ball of yours. Show me the press release. "If true, the revenue growth from the joint venture will undoubtedly be huge..." Once again, putting the cart before the horse. What joint venture? SHOW ME THE PRESS RELEASE! I don't "hate" GUMM and I don't have a vendetta against you or anyone else on this thread. I simply think that you and others are in a fantasy world when you make speculative statements as though they were fact. GUMM is NOT a sure thing and anybody that thinks otherwise is a complete and total fool. I have the right to argue that point on these threads just as much as you have the right to argue the opposite, whether I have a position or not.