Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Garry R. who wrote (4725)	10/28/1999 12:27:00 PM
From: Jack Rayfield	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8117

Garry R. I for one would not be satisfied with a "we cannot comment on this matter" post from Mr. Jacobs. But I agree with LOR that even a post or PR announcing a delay in the production process would be welcomed over just ignoring the question and finding out in January 2000 that the schedule espoused by Mr. Jacobs in April 1999 turned out to be totally unrealistic. The finalization of the design was in line with the time line Mr. Jacobs presented at the Vancouver Investors Forum in April 1999 so until recently I assumed that the timeline was still valid. Mr. Jacobs silence has really raised alot of doubts in my mind. I really do appreciate Mr. Jacobs posts to the thread. I just wish that keeping the shareholders informed of the production process regardless of whether it is on plan or behind plan was a higher priority at Pyng. It is like pulling hen's teeth to get an update on this hugely important area and I do not understand why. I am not looking for a PR every other day but an update once a month is not too much to ask in my opinion (I know that some other thread members do not agree and feel that production will happen when it happens and we should get off Pyng's back). I think the problem is that there are not enough people on the thread asking this important question and there are just enough of the thread members that believe in "let production develop on Pyng's time regardless of how long it takes" that the tough questions can be ignored as extreme. As long as the majority is silent ( read satisfied) why should Pyng go the extra mile to keep the shareholders informed. JMHO.