Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark J. Hardie who wrote (24535)	10/28/1999 11:05:00 AM
From: Guy Gadois	Respond to of 29386

"If you tell a Big Lie loud enough and often enough people will believe you"... and order your product. With apologies to Goebels. jon

To: Mark J. Hardie who wrote (24535)	10/28/1999 11:31:00 AM
From: Tom Duxbury	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29386

I have spoken to 2 of Ancors institutional investors over the past 2 days and trust me they understand what is going on. They know Brocade is on an intense smear campaign. The results of the Keylabs test were leaked to them a few days before the results were published. They had a good laugh. The main question that the institutions have is that if Brocade is the leader (80%) and have such a superior product, then why do they waste so much time on Ancor. I am told that when Brocade does an institutional presentation that sometimes half the time is spent smearing Ancor. The institutions are wise to this and they go out and buy Ancor (Fidelity). Brocade is only making itself look bad and my only concern is that they are starting to drag all the FC companies down with their B.S. and lack of ethics. OEMs both future and present IMO will be very reluctant to do business with Brocade (trust and ethics very much in question). Reyes is digging himself a huge hole by selling stock at the same time he is smearing Ancor and hyping his own stock with paid for reports.

To: Mark J. Hardie who wrote (24535)	10/28/1999 12:19:00 PM
From: ShamukE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29386

Isn't it up to exchange officials, SEC and perhaps others to make certain that it isn't collusion for personal gain. I've had friends investigated and severely punished for lesser manipulation. But then, they were ordinary guys not JOURNALISTS. It seems that when the perpetrator can cause one some discomfort nothing much happens. Shame on us for looking the other way.

To: Mark J. Hardie who wrote (24535)	10/30/1999 5:44:00 PM
From: Max Banan	Respond to of 29386

I think we should report these guys (Rocker, Greenberg, Dorfman, and Cramer) to SEC with enough evidence to get their butts out of this business. They are massing with people's life. I think it is only fair to mass with their life. We all have seen time to time how these guys orchestrate a simultaneous attack on a stock. They most likely short the stock before they go on attack. I am sure an investigation by SEC could expose them and teach the rest of these kind of white color criminals a lesson or two. Regards MB