To: Labrador who wrote (3851 ) 10/28/1999 9:38:00 PM From: gao seng Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4122
So it's OK with you that kenita can post fraudulent information on this board without fear of being assailed for improper acts by her readers. Why should she, she is in cahoots with all of you naysayers. I find that tolerance to be unethical and conspiratorial in nature. Lab, I think I know you by now. You like to think of yourself as a knowledgable investor, and IMDS is a company that seems very predicatable. So it is no coincidence that you like to post your opinions on this board. That is because your predictions always come out right. That is very much appreciated by some of us. And you have provided me with insights into the market that I consider invaluable. I am sure that other members feel the same. I think that this esteem by your fellow members is a tremendous asset. And I hate to question the authenticity of your motives. But in light of kenita's inappropriate board behavior, and your refusal to comment upon it, I have to scrutinize the value of your posts a little harder. I hope that I am wrong, as I have been in the past. But I will not attempt to dictate to you your conscience. If you are able to accept that type of indecency, then I will move on. I will conclude, perhaps improperly, that you are allowing yourself to be a conduit of a conspiracy. I wish you luck, knowing that you will not condemn the liar. I have always been wary of you, even though you showed a friendly side, something that is rare on this board. But it's time to move on. I have made up my mind on this matter, and I have decided that you are not the rational and calm minded investor I thought you were.