SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rick who wrote (9118)10/28/1999 9:39:00 PM
From: Apollo  Respond to of 54805
 
Comments by Mr. Fun on Lucent.......

To: GVTucker who wrote (10769)
From: Mr.Fun Thursday, Oct 28 1999 3:24PM ET
Respond to Post # 10778 of 10790

Comments on LU quarter:
1. Revenues - Sales were above even the most bullish analysts' expectations. This is the most important number for the quarter. For all of the "sturm und drang" about A/R DSOs and inventory, the real bear case suggested that the build up in these measures portended a drop in revenue growth. Wrong again Mr. Levy. Total sales for the fiscal year were up 20.5%, besting the high end of LU's guidance and easily making up for the light revenues in Q1.

2. Operating Margins - Lower than I would have expected. The company says it is a one-time phenomenon. I don't like it, but margins just aren't as important as they used to be (in investors minds).

3. Tax rate - I really don't see why Mr. Tucker believes coming in with a lower tax rate is "sloppy", or why he wouldn't give them credit for it. Tax rate is a product of careful management planning - one of the "five simultaneous equasions" LU uses to track its progress. It's a little like not giving credit if COGS fell because component costs were lower.

4. A/R DSO - Whether or not LU met its promises depends on whether you use average balance or end of period measures. Of course, I would have liked to have seen them exceed expectations unambiguously. As for converting a $600M receivable from Saudi Arabia that had been uncollected for 9 months into a vendor financing contract with interest payments, I say what took you so long. BTW this is not factoring a receivable - factoring specifically means turning a receivable over to a 3rd party for collections and accepting a % of the nominal value. What LU did with the Saudis was with the agreement of the customer, involved interest payments and was syndicated to a bank at full nominal value. Nonetheless, I would expect further improvement next quarter. In summary - minor league negative, not a big deal as long as the top line continues to come in.

5. BCS - Sales were flat YoY vs. a tough compare. No one should have been surprised about this. Every sell sider called this one. I do not understand Mr. Tucker's comment about BCS being dependable and Network Systems not being dependable. I would have put exactly the other way. I would like to see LU divest itself of Systimax and anyother part of BCS that is not pulling its weight.

6. Sales to Network Operators - Astoundingly strong - 32% growth. Strong domestic and strong overseas. Strong in voice, strong in data. Strong in wireless, strong in optical.

7. Recent trading - There was a little profit taking yesterday - also, NT's stunning 300bp increase in 2000 sales growth guidance took a little wind from the sails (N.B. I like NT, however, I think the recent love fest is a little over done, but I'll comment on that at a later date) The Nov. 11 analyst conference is coming. I believe this means contract announcements and new products. There is a real shift toward optimism amongst the sell side, and I expect this to be one of the best stocks on the board for the next 6-12 months.

BTW while I understand my comments come off as cheerleading to some, they are my fundamental viewpoints. I do not anticipate that I will like LU as an investment idea forever. However, for now, I think it is the best opportunity on the tech board.



To: Rick who wrote (9118)10/29/1999 2:51:00 AM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Why does "armhy" appear on this W and W list and not on Uncle Franks?

I guess I don't understand your question. Surely you are not implying pongid status.

lurking ...

lurqer