SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (91198)10/28/1999 9:31:00 PM
From: Felix Appolonia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,
Mr Greenspanker sent you this

Felix

Greenspan sees market forces slowing growth
Fed chairman leaves door open for more rate hikes

By Rex Nutting, CBS MarketWatch
Last Update: 7:33 PM ET Oct 28, 1999
See: Bond Report

BOCA RATON, Fla. (CBS.MW) -- Alan Greenspan hasn't made up his mind
yet.

In a speech Thursday evening to a group of chief executives, the Federal
Reserve chairman tackled the toughest question now facing Fed policy-makers
-- how long will the high-tech productivity boom keep inflation under wraps? --
but did not come up with a definitive answer.

Nor did he definitively answer the toughest question
now facing the markets: Will the Fed raise rates in three
weeks?

Greenspan raised all the usual warning flags about
the limits of growth, but he also suggested that market
forces (read: higher interest rates and the stock-market
correction) may already be at work to bring demand
back to a sustainable pace. A text of the Fed
chairman's speech was pre-released in Washington.

Containment under way?

Once the limits of labor-force growth and the ability to
finance imports are reached, he warned, "market
pressures must eventually emerge that work to contain
such unsustainable growth."

But here's the good news: "The process of
containment may already be significantly advanced."
Strong demand for capital has forced interest rates
higher, especially for corporate debt. And higher rates have reduced "the ratio of
net worth to income for the average household," he said

In other words, the market sank. "Market pressures" ought to contain consumer
demand, Greenspan said, although he admitted that he doesn't really know
how long it'll take.

Something for everyone

Those urging tighter policy from the Fed on Nov. 16 will certainly find passages
in the text to bolster their arguments. But Greenspan gave equal or greater
solace to those who argue that the economy has entered a long-term era of
high growth fueled by historic levels of innovation.

"Although it still is possible to argue that the evident increase in productivity
growth is ephemeral, I find such arguments hard to believe," Greenspan said.

And then, in the very next sentence, he dropped the other shoe: "But how long
can we expect this remarkable period of innovation to continue?"

It may be, he said, that we have only begun to exploit the new technologies
and that the boom will last 25 years or more, as IBM's (IBM: news, msgs) Lou
Gerstner has argued. Nevertheless, the crucial issue for the Fed is not the
length of the productivity boom but its pace relative to consumer demand.

"The rate of growth of productivity cannot continue to increase indefinitely," he
said, quickly pointing out that the data do not yet show "evidence of a
downward bend point in productivity growth."

If productivity were to "plateau" in an environment of tight labor markets, "unit
costs would likely rise, pressuring profit margins and prices," he said.

Using data from the revised gross domestic product released earlier Thursday
(see related story), Greenspan figured that productivity in the nonfinancial
corporate sector has averaged 4 percent in the past two years, more than
double the figure in the 1970s and 1980s.

"Moreover, the acceleration in productivity appears reasonably widespread
among nonfinancial corporate firms beyond the high-tech industries themselves,
even though gains in output per hour in the advanced technology companies
have verged on the awesome," Greenspan said.

Rex Nutting is Washington bureau chief for CBS MarketWatch.




To: Paul Engel who wrote (91198)10/28/1999 9:35:00 PM
From: Fred Fahmy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, re: <Intel was QUITE BULLISH !>

Indeed..... uncharacteristically so.

Of course given their products (current and future), their talent, their resources, and a technology based global economy centered around their CPU's...I'd say they have plenty to be bullish about.

FF



To: Paul Engel who wrote (91198)10/28/1999 10:18:00 PM
From: greg s  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, Amy, & John Hull re:Intel was QUITE BULLISH !

Intel execs. did an excellent job in addressing, point-by-point, all of the FUD that has been circulating recently ... Y2K, Taiwan, mfg. issues (yes, it IS demand), strength across market and geography boundaries ... all laid to rest! Add to that, clear excitement about 2000 and new products.

Intel even addressed individual segments such as networking, communication, & services (as Amy wanted to hear at the earnings cc).

Well done and much needed! I'm excited to see Intel take such a factual/aggressive approach.

Greg.