Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (77660)	10/28/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574485

Elmer - RE: "The benchmarks you posted from Toms page were ALL 800MHz kryotech benchmarks. Rather deceptive." My original message was comparing benchmarks MHz for MHz and I still am. The links I gave do have Kryotech benchmarks, but they also have Athlon 700 scores vs. Coppermine 700 scores. You are clearly comparing Athlon 700 vs. Coppermine 733. I am not contesting that Coppermine 733 is faster than Athlon 700. If you wanna compare AMD's 700MHz scores vs. CuMine 700 scores here is the link to Intel's 700 scores - intel.com And don't forget JMark 2.0 again!