SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (14075)10/29/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: gbh  Respond to of 18016
 
ZO, I'm not saying its obvious. And I have reviewed LU's patents personally. But its a fact that ASND payed for them.

As for why NN did not license before, I have no clue. They may feel they have a case that these ATM patents of LU are really unenforceable. One thing is certain. They are going up against a company that is very skilled in extracting from other companies what they feel is rightfully theirs.

Gary



To: zbyslaw owczarczyk who wrote (14075)10/29/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: pat mudge  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18016
 
You don't go to trial if you're not sure of your position.

Right now ECI's suing TI and TI said, Fine, take us to court. If ECI had a leg to stand on both sides would have settled. As it is, ECI has so much to gain they're willing to feed their lawyers for a long time.

I suspect it's the same with LU.

Pat


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News