SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (19963)10/29/1999 11:55:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Kim, Thank you for both clarifications. The "triple check" is certainly a smart move and keeps everyone honest in the process.

You mentioned that there are actually indications for over 100 metallic and non metallic elements at FL. Not to beat a dead horse on this, but are the 40 elements being tested selected because of some empirical data indicating they are good candidates for economic recovery from the brine and clay or is it just a standard broad band test?

Thanks again for your time and effort!

Tom F.



To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (19963)10/29/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Kim,
Thanks for the quick response.

Since there are over 100 metallic elements present in the clay, will separating those elements in order to produce the targeted metals be more costly or more difficult?

What is the possibility that one or more of those elements will interfere with either detection or production of Lithium, boron, etc. and give us either a more difficult recovery process, or a high cost process?

Mark


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News