SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (91334)10/29/1999 5:34:00 PM
From: Windsock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Alibi Dan - Re: "Meanwhile AMD is ahead 1 to nothing in .13 capable copper FABs"

Dresden is not yet running and will not start production until Q2. When Dresden does start, it will run a O.18 process NOT a 0.13 process.

Try a return from spacy dream-world to planet earth.



To: Dan3 who wrote (91334)10/29/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: John F. Dowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan3: Interesting and imaginative arguments. I especially like the one that suggests we should buy stocks based on their price irrespective of the underlying earnings per share. Maybe that will fly on QVC. JFD



To: Dan3 who wrote (91334)10/29/1999 10:13:00 PM
From: exhon2004  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dan3:

re >>And don't forget that Intel presently costs 100 times as much as AMD in terms of stock price (taking into account the number of shares outstanding<<

I believe you meant to say Intel's valuation is 100 times as great as AMD's. The most popular way to measure their relative costs would be with P/E ratios. Unfortunately, (for AMD), this is impossible, because negative P/E's are meaningless.

Greg