Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (91339)	10/29/1999 5:16:00 PM
From: Felix Appolonia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

GV I'll stand corrected if I referred to "market makers" instead of "brokerages" which employ "analysts". It seems that many analysts in last 3 wks were wrong about Intel and many individuals sold the stock. The analysts provide us with the information to cause volatility to buy on dips. Other than that it seems that too many analysts are wrong. My opinion, and I am not in the financial services industry so I would appreciate yours. Felix

To: GVTucker who wrote (91339)	10/29/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: Felix Appolonia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

GV- Re "That I'll buy, to a certain extent. It goes on a lot on the long end, but almost never on the short end. An affiliated money manager may sell off a little of a long position, though." GV- I still believe that their "analysts" make bad comments, impact stock prices, cause investors to sell, and three weeks later they upgrade the stock after it has moved up 10.00 per share. Some analysts don't know Intel, don't know the "big picture", and it is actually a joke that all of their comments are based on "not meeting earnings." They create volatility and opportunity to buy on dips, but other than that, what is your opinion of some of their advice ? Thnks Felix