SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (31883)10/29/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 99985
 
Heinz, dollar drop offshore money getting out of the US just as simple.

They smell a soft economy coming in the US plus some stagflation.

Haim



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (31883)10/30/1999 3:55:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99985
 
Well this is going to be one interesting end of year that is for sure. I have run through at least the charts I keep posted on my site and they are for the most part supporting the bull case. I have bullish forks that support this rally and they fit pretty well. The TYX made a waterfall drop and a weekly bearish engulfing hinting that rates should continue to drop and the Bond should continue to rise following as I posted here off and on class two signals for a week. I did have a class 3 over bought on the Dollar so it's drop may have just been technical and I have to admit, I can't get any good lines on it so I don't know the extent it will drop before recovering.

I see a few danger sign hints like IBM, DELL and CPQ trying to party with the rest in the rally despite warnings, lower earnings etc yet at the same time companies that did well on earnings and gave bright outlooks like MMM dropped ina nasty way Thursday and Friday. A mix of euphoria and pessimism or else dumping of "granny stocks" to chase the high flyers maybe?

I am basically inthe bull camp but am worried about a few things as I put in my comments section on my site. On that note, sorry that I was late updating but I had a busy morning and just finally finished my update. My site of course is at
home.att.net

For those that have good historical charts, I would take a look at 1994 and the rally that happened then. That was about the best comparison I could find to this one and keeps me guarded in my optimism. Basically I couldn't find where a correction ever recovered like we are now. '94 had the closest thing to this with large white candles and gaps like now starting 10 October. It shot up for 3 days then slowed down and continued to climb slowly for 5 days. It then retraced 50% for weeks, had a one week rally then made new lows in December ending on December 9th. It then had a more normal rally back to the 200 Expodential DMA and sat on it for 3 weeks until 95 when it finally started this last accelerated bull leg to now. Others I looked at that kind of looked like now were Dec 91, April 92, May 94 and they all retested their lows later on.

Basically my charts are bullish but history is against a genuine recovery here. Which will win, the charts or history?

Good Luck,

Lee



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (31883)10/31/1999 10:36:00 AM
From: Les H  Respond to of 99985
 
Corporate Bond Yields Top 8.00%
John Lonski, Moody's senior economist in New York

An accumulation of global inflation risks has lifted borrowing costs for
both corporations and municipalities. Joining a climb in Moody's
long-term investment grade corporate bond yield average to a 4.5 year
high of 8.02% on October 21st, our municipal bond yield average topped
6.00% for the first time since March 1995. Thirty year lows of 6.72% for
investment grade corporate bonds in December 1998 and 4.93% for long-term
municipal bonds in October 1998 offset much of the damage from economic
turmoil overseas and set the stage for a surge in interest sensitive
activity.

Long-term investment grade corporate bond yields now top the annual
growth rate of core CPI inflation by 6.0 percentage points, which falls
just shy of a peak in real corporate borrowing costs at 6.1% in December
1994. Nominal borrowing costs still fall far short of November 1994's
8.94% in corporate bond yields.

In response to the then steep climb in real borrowing costs from 4.1% in
December 1993, corporate bond issuance would plummet from $52.8 billion
in the fourth quarter of 1993 to $25.0 billion in 1994's final three
months. As real corporate bond yield retreated to 4.2% in 1995's fourth
quarter, the quarterly tally of corporate bond issuance would recover to
$51.7 billion.

Earlier this year, rising interest rates were not overly lethal to bond
offerings given that the 5.0% average real long-term corporate bond yield
remained below its 5.6% average of the last 15 years. As a result, the
$14.8 billion average monthly investment grade corporate bond sales in
1999's first half was virtually identical to the $14.7 billion monthly
average in 1998, or when real corporate bond yields averaged 4.6%.

However, as real corporate bond yields jumped from 5.2% to 5.7% from the
first to the second quarter, corporate bond sales slumped from $78.7
billion to $48.2 billion over the same span. Thus far, interest rates
have risen this year in anticipation of an emergence of inflation that
has as yet been largely unrealized. Bond yields may not move
significantly higher until faster price growth begins to trim real
borrowing costs.

If higher product prices generate a recovery in corporate earnings, a
pick-up in inflation risks would be evident. A recovery in global demand
has boosted commodity prices and the revenues of basic materials and
energy companies this year largely through a reversal of last year's
steep declines. However, our index of industrial metals prices remains
6.7% below its level at the start of the Asian crisis while businesses
have generally been unable to raise prices indiscriminately without
jeopardizing sales growth. Inflation will need to become less myth and
more broad reality for nominal interest rates to approach their level at
the end of 1994.

Services Absent From Latest Climb In Inflation
A faster pace of consumer spending abroad diminishes the need for overseas
competitors to offset weakness in domestic markets by trimming prices to
boost sales growth in the US. Further, the expansion of overseas demand
has lifted the price of industrial commodities, which has served to raise
inflation pressures in the US but also firmed the earnings and credit
worth of a number of energy and basic materials companies.

Since most recently peaking at 3.3% in December 1996, the annual growth
of the consumer price index descended to a low of 1.5% as of November
1998 before rebounding to 2.6% in September. However, higher commodity
prices are almost exclusively responsible for the CPI's climb (see nearby
graph).

After falling from 3.1% in December 1996 to -0.3% in March 1998, the
year-to-year change in the commodity component of the CPI has since
climbed back to the 2.8% increase of September 1999. Over the same span,
the annual growth of service price inflation has fallen from December
1996's 3.4% advance to 2.5% as of September 1999, which differs
insignificantly from the most recent low of 2.4% in August 1999.

The 0.4% average monthly rise in the CPI's commodity component in the
half year ended September was up sharply from the flat average monthly
change over the first 21 months of the Asian crisis. In contrast, the
0.2% monthly rise in service prices over the last six months was
identical to the average monthly gain over the prior 21 month span. An
extended acceleration of inflation is less likely absent a contribution
from the 58% of the CPI represented by services. An inflationary increase
in business pricing power might be inferred if the price of services
begins to climb higher.

Inflation risks are transmitted globally primarily through changes in the
price of tradable goods and exchange rates. Unlike the CPI, services are
excluded from the Labor Department's primary index of import prices. In
response to global economic weakness, the yearly change in import prices
excluding oil related goods deepened from -1.8% in June 1997 to a bottom
of -4.2% as of September 1998. A higher federal funds rate and a flatter
0.5% year-to-year decline in the non-fuel import prices in September
1999 follows closely the rebound in overseas demand.

That the CPI has followed closely the path of commodity prices underscores
the extent to which overseas economic weakness underpinned rumblings of
deflation. The moderation of service price inflation notwithstanding the
acceleration of commodity prices serves to highlight the ongoing inability
of businesses to lift prices. September's 3.4% year-to-year rise in
medical care services was below the 3.6% annual increase of both
September 1998 and the last five years. Similarly, the yearly increase in
the price of education and communication has climbed from 0.2% in June to
1.0% as of September, which nevertheless trailed the 2.9% average yearly
rise of the last five years as well as September 1998's 1.2% increase.

Demand For Short-Term Funds Widens Money Market Spreads
A desire to maintain liquidity as a defensive measure near the end of
this year has accelerated the pace of short-term debt growth of late.
While a steady if unspectacular supply of bond offerings suggests that
access to long-term capital has not dried up in response to Y2k related
worries, corporations can establish and additional margin of safety by
accessing money markets.

The ultimate effects of Y2k are unknown but the potential downside risks
warrant a cautious operating stance. Few corporate finance officials
want to be caught short on liquidity in a manner that would jeopardize
sales, debt service or the ability to meet short-term obligations,
including payroll, as they arise. As the failure of statistical risk
models relying primarily on historical data to fully capture the
pronounced increase in risk aversion of last fall demonstrates,
contingency planning requires preparing for the downside risks of the
worst case scenarios, regardless of probability.

Short-term debt growth is likely to accelerate after bottoming in the
third quarter. Since soaring by 27.6% annually in September 1998, the
year-to-year growth of commercial paper outstanding had descended to 8.1%
as of September 1999 for the flattest such rise since November 1994. As
of mid-October, the yearly increase in commercial paper had climbed back
to 13.6%. Similarly, September's 11.3% annualized advance in commercial
and industrial loans outstanding topped annualized growth rates of 5.2%
over the last six months and 6.5% since September 1998.

In response to a strong demand for funds as a precaution against liquidity
shortfalls around the century date change, three-month dollar LIBOR
rates have climbed from 5.51% in mid-September to a recent 6.22%. The
spread over T-bills on 90-day commercial paper has soared from 72 basis
points to 102 basis points over the last four weeks.

Commercial paper spreads peaked at 111 basis points in October 1998 with
a high of 153 basis points on October 16th, 1998, or one day after the
Fed engineered a mid-meeting emergency 25 basis point cut in the federal
funds target. In contrast to late 1998's reactionary jump in yield
spreads, an increase in risk aversion prior to the possible arrival of
liquidity problems. If Y2k is a yawner, money market spreads should fall
sharply as redemptions increase and liquidity fears subside.