SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JPR who wrote (9166)10/29/1999 8:35:00 PM
From: JPR  Respond to of 12475
 
dawn.com
China sees US as biggest threat to global stability

By Kevin Platt

China excoriates US as a ROGUE STATE.. Heloo Pakistan, Do you feel better now?
BEIJING: Like the US, China says it sees the potential emergence of a "rogue" state that
could throw the world out of balance early in the next century.

Washington warns that unpredictable regimes in North Korea or Iraq could one day develop
long-range missiles and a handful of atomic bombs to engage in nuclear blackmail or worse.

But China's top arms control negotiator, Sha Zukang, says a bigger threat to global stability is
already armed to the teeth with hydrogen bombs and sophisticated rockets that can send a
nuclear payload to any point on the planet. That country, Sha says, is the United States.
China is crapping in pants
"Because the US believes it's the only superpower in the world, it can act at will, without
regard for international law and international norms," he says.

Washington seems to be developing a stubbornness against abiding by weapons' control pacts
and a greater penchant to use armed force against its real or perceived enemies, Sha
complains.
US is drunk with power according to China
The end of the cold war and the break-up of the Soviet Union has not ushered in an era of
global peace, he says. Rather, it is creating a US that is drunk with its own power and
technological prowess, adds Sha, whose official title is director-general of the Arms Control
and Disarmament Department of the Chinese foreign ministry.
China?s Sha is a softie, but disillusioned with US
Sha is not one of the Communist Party hard-liners here who regularly lashes out at the US.
Rather, he is affable, cosmopolitan, and open, and seems more disillusioned than angry with
the US.
Sha of China condemns US bombing of Sudan
Sha cites as one example of aggressiveness the US bombing of a medical plant in Sudan that
American intelligence initially accused of producing chemical weapons.

The 1998 missile attack was not approved by any global organization, and the US has never
offered the world community solid proof that the plant made anything but medicine.
China brands US as TERRORIST STATE
"The US bombing of Sudan was an act of state terrorism," Sha says. There is a growing list,
he adds, of similar acts of aggression against sovereign states in violation of the UN Charter or
other global laws.
Sha remembers the Belgrade China Embassy bombing
Not only did the US and Nato launch a massive attack on Yugoslavia without obtaining the
UN's approval, but the coalition delivered, with pinpoint precision, five missiles into Beijing's
embassy in Belgrade.

That bombing "was an obvious violation of the Vienna Convention," he says. While Beijing
appreciates Washington's apologies and compensation for victims of the attack, the US
government "still has to identify the culprits [behind the bombing] and bring them to justice."

A US official formerly based in Beijing agrees. "So far the [US] government has said
institutional mistakes led to the bombing of the Chinese Embassy," says the official, who
spoke on condition of anonymity. "But specific individuals were responsible for mistakenly
targeting the embassy, and heads should roll as a result of those fatal mistakes."

Sha suggests the growing disregard of the US for international weapons conventions and rules
of war is, in turn, making China more circumspect about joining arms control regimes.

"We might have already ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty if not for the bombing of
our embassy in Yugoslavia," he says.

That treaty, which aims to ban all nuclear weapons testing, was rejected by the US Senate
even though "the US was the first country to promote and to sign the treaty," Sha says. Sha
says he is puzzled by the vote not only because Washington was one of the pact's top
proponents, but also because it would have allowed the US to lock in its nuclear superiority
and prevent any wannabes from gate-crashing the nuclear club. "The US has the biggest and
most sophisticated nuclear arsenal in the world," and could have frozen that advantage
perpetually by signing the treaty, he says.

Instead, the Senate's vote against ratification is alienating the US from the rest of the world,
Sha says. "Not a single country in the world has given its support for the US Senate's
rejection of the treaty."

China's defence ministry is now reviewing the test ban pact, and hints that Beijing could ratify
it early next year, during a spring meeting of the national legislature.

"I negotiated [the treaty] - it's my baby," says Sha, who adds that he wants to see it ratified as
soon as possible. Washington's abandonment of the nuclear treaty it pushed so hard to help
produce "was wrong politically and morally, but at least it did not violate any international
agreements," Sha says.
With china bristling with nuclear weapons, what do you expect from US? a national anti-missile shield
More alarming, he says, is a US plan to build a national anti-missile shield that would violate
the 1972 Anti-ballistic Missile Treaty.

Russia, which also signed the ABM pact, and China last week introduced a resolution in the
United Nations warning the US not to break the treaty.

Defence experts in Russia, the US, and China agree that if the Pentagon starts building the
missile defence system, a "star wars"-like project designed to shoot down incoming rockets,
countries that fear a nuclear first strike from the US could speed up their own missile
production as a countermeasure. Sha says "the ABM is a cornerstone of maintaining global
strategic stability," and warns that if Washington violates the pact after refusing to approve the
nuclear test ban, the twin actions "could trigger a worldwide chain reaction."

"This has the possibility to destroy all the progress we have made in nuclear nonproliferation
... in the post-cold-war era," Sha says.

He says that the US moves "may touch off an arms race in all fields, including the nuclear and
missile fields." Sha adds that setting up a missile defence in violation of the ABM treaty could
also, for the first time in human history, "set off an arms race in outer space."-Dawn/ Christian
Science Monitor News Service