Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ausdauer who wrote (7907)	10/30/1999 7:08:00 PM
From: Michael A. Gottesman	Respond to of 60323

Here is the actually text of FRCP 65(c): "No restraining order or preliminary injunction shall issue except upon the giving of security by the applicant, in such sum as the court deems proper, for the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any party who is found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. No such security shall be required of the United States or of an officer or agency thereof." So it appears that Lexar has requested a bond. The "notice of filing" by Lexar on 9/20/99 is probably an indication by Lexar of what they would consider the appropriate amount of the bond. Of course the Court will deem the proper amount. The notice was served upon Sandisk. In all likelihood, the Judge made his ruling on 9/17 indicating the terms of the injunction and the attorneys were to agree on the actual wording of the written order and submit an agreed to form of order to the court. The motion by Lexar on 9/20 probably indicates the inability to agree on the form of the order. Mike G.