Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (4487)	10/31/1999 8:25:00 AM
From: 24601	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

A thoroughly dishonest post. Not one of the three links has anything to do with any of the three companies that are defamed in the sentence that precedes them. I know nothing about GUMM and REFR. But those friends of Bill who have risen to defend him against the WAVX longs who took umbrage at his scatology should take note. BW is not talking "portfolio adjustment" here. He is engaging in gratuitously vulgar namecalling in the absence of any analytic rigor. I will try very hard not to return. Please don't tempt me.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (4487)	10/31/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

The GUMM shills are some of the most organized I've seen. When I told them that Zicam had absolutely NO effect on my cold, they claimed that I either had the flu, walking pneumonia, allergies or was an outright liar. They just can't believe that their precious Ziscam won't work as predicted for everyone. Just like the ZONA shills, they base all their hopes on management's promises and future sales figures that never seem to materialize. All the while, GUMM continues to be a NET money LOSER.