SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LOCKHEED MARTIN, (LMT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tech Master who wrote (597)11/1/1999 8:50:00 AM
From: Lee Ring  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 732
 
01:03 PM ET 10/31/99

Laser Could Be Key Part of Defense

Laser Could Be Key Part of Defense
By ROBERT BURNS=
AP Military Writer=
SEATTLE (AP) _ Across the street from a museum depicting the
Wright brothers' historic flights at Kitty Hawk, N.C., nearly 100
years ago, a new breed of aviation pioneer is chasing a 21st
century dream: an airplane armed with speed-of-light weaponry that
can destroy enemy missiles in flight.
The airborne laser is a little known but potentially important
part of a future defense against missile attack. The work being
done at Boeing Co.'s development center is part of an effort to
leap ahead of the traditional approach to missile defense.
Critics and doubters say it may be an expensive flop like many
other attempted innovations in missile defense over the past two
decades.
The Clinton administration is developing two kinds of missile
defense systems, both possibly using laser weapons:
_Relying on the airborne laser to help provide protection
against missile attack on U.S. and allied troops abroad.
_Protecting the U.S. homeland, first by shooting down missiles
with other missiles and later, perhaps, with laser weapons orbiting
in outer space.
Air Force Gen. Michael Ryan sees a bright future for airborne
lasers.
``We think we've got all the physics about right,' he said
recently. ``Now we need to see if we can engineer it onto the
(airplane) and shoot it. That's the next test. This could be a
revolutionary kind of capability.'
Boeing technical specialists and managers of the airborne laser
project say it has evolved from an intriguing theory to an almost
realized fact. If the current schedule holds, they will have a
chance in four years to test it against Scud missiles of the type
Iraq launched in the 1991 Gulf War.
If the tests are successful and Congress remains supportive, the
first three combat-ready planes would be ready for duty by 2007,
and the full fleet of seven planes would be operating by 2009.
``We still have technical problems, but we really have no
inventions left to go,' said Stephen Sauve, Boeing's deputy
program director. He acknowledges that the physics of firing a
laser beam from an airplane are complicated, but he and others at
Boeing sound confident it will work.
One of the biggest technological challenges is to correct for
distortion of the laser beam as it travels through the atmosphere.
The chemical oxygen iodine laser, made by TRW, already has
proved lethal in ground tests. The trick is getting the laser, the
beam control system, computers and other gear to work together at
40,000 feet.
``This was meant to be done on Earth,' Sauve said. We're going
to be doing it on an airplane.'
The ``battle management' software to operate the on-board
computers and other equipment has been ready since July, Sauve
said, although Lockheed Martin Corp. still is working on the beam
control software.
In April, the program is due for what the Pentagon calls a
``critical design review' _ an assessment of the program's
progress and promise and a decision on whether to proceed to the
live-fire tests against Scud missiles.
Physics aside, the project also faces political questions. Among
them is whether an airborne laser could be deployed without
violating the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, which is intended
to prevent either the United States or Russia from building a
national defense against missile attack.
While the airborne laser is not planned to be part of a U.S.
national defense system, the laser weapon might be judged by the
Russians to have been built on ``physical principles' that the
treaty is meant to prohibit.
``It's certainly in the gray area' of treaty compliance, said
Spurgeon Keeny Jr., who was part of the U.S. government team that
helped draft the ABM treaty. Now he is president of the Arms
Control Association, a private group critical of U.S. missile
defense efforts. Keeny's group also opposes the administration's
efforts to revise the ABM treaty to permit national missile
defenses.
The administration has not pushed for treaty changes clarifying
the legality of the airborne laser.
Lt. Col. Joel Owens, director of management operations for the
airborne laser project office at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.,
said in an interview that while the Defense Department has not made
a final decision on whether the laser is compliant with the ABM
treaty, he expects a favorable ruling in 2001.
Kenny and other critics question whether the Air Force could get
one of its slow-flying airborne lasers into position quickly enough
to respond to a missile attack, and whether it could avoid getting
shot down.
The Air Force intends to base a fleet of laser-equipped aircraft
in the United States. They would be sent on 24 hours notice
anywhere in the world where U.S. or allied troops faced the threat
of missile attack.
The hope would be that the mere presence of the airborne laser
orbiting the sky on the periphery of a potential battle area would
deter an attack.
But if a missile were launched, the plane could spot it with an
infrared sensor, then instantly calculate the trajectory and find
the range. Within five seconds of launch detection, the high-energy
laser would be aimed and fired, striking the missile so early in
its ascent that debris _ including the warhead _ would fall back
onto the nation that launched it.
The program is 28 percent completed. About $1.6 billion has been
spent so far,. The Air Force estimates that the final bill for
buying seven aircraft with lasers and operating them for 20 years
will be $11.3 billion.