SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Whodunit? Two Stockbrokers Murdered in Jersey; No Clues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (234)10/31/1999 3:40:00 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1156
 
Yes, Afrayem Onigwecher has many Fans on SI

Member 3038133
To: afrayem onigwecher (0 )
From: John Reed Stark Friday, Jun 11 1999 10:16AM ET
Reply # of 1375

THE FOLLOWING IS AN ANNOUNCEMENT MADE BY THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

June 11, 1999

Net Command Tech, Inc. File No. 500-1

ORDER OF SUSPENSION OF TRADING

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Net Command Tech, Inc. f/k/a Corsaire, Inc. ("NCT"), an Internet technology company whose common stock is being quoted in the over-the-counter market, because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of publicly available information disseminated by NCT and others to market makers of the stock of NCT, other broker dealers, and to investors concerning, among other things: (1) the purported acquisition by NCT of certain companies' assets and stock and the value of those assets and stock; (2) a $1.5 million line of credit purportedly secured by NCT from a European bank; (3) the revenue generated by an American company purportedly acquired by NCT; and (4) the business success and reputation of NCT's CEO and president.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, on June 11, 1999, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on June 24, 1999.

By the Commission.

Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 41517 / June 11, 1999

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), of over-the-counter trading of the securities of Net Command Tech, Inc. ("NCT"), of New York, New York, at 9:30 a.m. EDT, on June 11, 1999, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 24, 1999.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of NCT because of questions that have been raised about the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, the purported acquisition by NCT of certain companies' assets and stock and the value of those assets and stock, a $1.5 million line of credit purportedly secured by NCT from a European bank, the revenue generated by an American company purportedly acquired by NCT, and the business success and reputation of NCT's CEO and president.

The Commission cautions broker dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by the company.

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to NCT's securities until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation which is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

If any broker dealer or other person has any information which may be related to this matter, the Miami, Florida office of the Securities and Exchange Commission should be telephoned at (305) 982-6390.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (234)10/31/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1156
 
Well, reposting the question is certainly not answering it. Why did you post that post??

Why would you answer my post with an obfuscation; it makes look even worse. I am sure there is a simple answer.

Afrayem, What is it? Why did you post that post which implies that you know something? To make a post like that if you don't know anything is sort of a violation of the law, I think. You certainly understand our wish for clarification, don't you?



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (234)10/31/1999 3:52:00 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1156
 
Hey Afrayem, how are the boys doing over at Wall and Broad Equities? Seems they trade the same exact stocks that are in your profile that you have posted on.

orneys' fees. The Company believes that the claims are without merit, and that it has good defenses which it will assert at the appropriate time. The action is currently in its preliminary stages. In a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated May 29, 1997, the Company reported a complaint against the Company captioned Mordechai Gurary v. Isaac Winehouse, Isaac Winehouse d/b/a Wall & Broad Equities and Nu-Tech Bio-Med, Inc. (Docket No. 97 Civ. 3803 (LBS)) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On February 9, 1998, the court dismissed with prejudice the federal claims of violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act for failure to state a claim and dismissed the state claims of violations of Section 349 of the General Business Law o