Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 24601 who wrote (4507)	10/31/1999 7:35:00 PM
From: J.Y. Wang	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10293

The Bill Wexler thread reminds me more and more of my old BBS days where flames were the rule rather than the exception. This used to be a profitable source of information about shorting stocks. Now, Bill hypes longs with the best of them and perpetuates the flames by responding to every one of them from the longs/promoters/shills/whatever of the few stocks he still shorts. This base is becoming less and less useful.

To: 24601 who wrote (4507)	10/31/1999 7:57:00 PM
From: Mike M	Respond to of 10293

Now, can you demonstrate that you know jack about Wave, its intellectual properties, its partnerships, its business plan, or its milestone achievements? Sorry, 24601, knowing jack about the companies that he maligns has not been a criteria as long as I have seen his work. He proudly acknowledged 3 minutes of due diligence with GUMM.